A classical structure that is used to analyze the water and diamond paradox provides an intuitive underpinning to the modern theory of welfare measurement in a growth context. John Law’s and Adam Smith’s concepts of value-in-use and value-in-exchange have modern aggregated counterparts. Complemented with Dupuit’s extension in terms of a utility function with a declining marginal utility, they are close to enough to provide the…
Publication Keyword: the water and diamond paradox
in /storage/content/64/156064/beijer.kva.se/public_html/wp-content/themes/beijer/archive.php on line 42
Call stack:
include()
wp-includes/template-loader.php:106require_once()
wp-blog-header.php:19require()
index.php:17